In all classrooms there is a student, who despite getting
90+ in all subjects, is unable to get into the top 5 because he scores poorly
in drawing. In Indian cricket, Anil Kumble is that student.
India had a Trinity, the Big Three, a sort of P5 or G7 –
Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly and Rahul Dravid. Later it got expanded to
include new geniuses Virender Sehwag and V V S Laxman and became the Big Five.
Still no Kumble. Whichever way you look at it, logically or illogically, Kumble
should have been there. He took 619 Test wickets, Six Hundred Nineteen of them.
He is the only Indian bowler, and the second in the world, to have taken 10
wickets in an innings. A perfect 10, a Nadia Comaneci.
We talk about Tendulkar asking Sivaramakrishnan to bowl on
the rough outside leg stump to prepare for Shane Warne. But we don’t remember
Warne bowling over after over, hour after hour, leg cutters on the middle
stump, letting Tendulkar comfortably leave the ball, before delivering that one
flipper which fooled the Master, catching him leg before wicket.
That is the life of a bowler.
Both Warne and Kumble were strategisers. Each of their
wicket was a plot. But one never became a captain and the other had to wait his
turn, till Tendulkar, Ganguly and Dravid finished theirs. That too as a filler
before Mahendra Singh Dhoni could step in. As captain he won three and lost five
Tests, but gave a memorable win over Australia on the Perth pitch, one that
remained untamed for a long time.
Ask which Indian team deserved to win the World Cup, we would
safely say the ones which had Tendulkar, Ganguly, Dravid, Sehwag, Laxman and
Kumble in it. Barring Sachin and Sehwag, none has a World Cup to show for their
20 years of toil. And all those years, Kumble had been watching from the outfield
what happened on the pitch. Were there times when he thought, “No, someone else
should have bowled that over, or there should have been a fielder at point, why
was he removed…”? I am sure there were.
After all, he was a strategiser.
The Indian coach’s job finally gave Kumble an opportunity to
live that dream. He didn’t win a World Cup as a player, maybe he could as a
coach. On paper, the timing was right. India had a young team, Kumble was much,
much senior. He would have been the guy to look up to. But times have changed, cricket
has changed, stars have realigned. Kumble is past, Kohli is future. Money rides
on Kohli, and nothing overrides money.
No comments:
Post a Comment